Pipeline Flow Control Molecular Alignment System Considered

Is there a way to use frequency waves to change the molecular viscosity and density of the combined molecules that make up a liquid or gas inside of a pipeline? Can we do this without completely breaking down the molecular bonds, and play with the molecules at the atomic level for brief periods of time? I believe we should be able to do this, and that perhaps we might be able to control the flow within a pipeline; for instance natural gas, oil, water, or other chemicals.

In doing so we can prevent stress fractures in places where there are severe vortex flows or near elbows in the pipeline or changes in direction or elevation. In fact, we might be able to control the flow completely by sending radio waves, sonar, microwaves, or even perhaps lasers at certain points along the pipeline. Indeed, this might even be more apropos as carbon nanotube composites become more available, and are used on pipelines.

As you know on crude oil pipelines there are issues with corrosion and rust from the sulfur content, these sorts of things eat up the pipeline. And this causes challenges for maintenance, longevity, not to mention the environmental component. After all whenever there is a pipeline break it sure makes a mess, and that product is not able to get to market, which causes hell with the supply-chain, and cost of the commodity.

The only question would be the power component involved, although in the case of pipelines coming over a hill, the fluid on the way down could be used to turn small Hydro like generators to power up the frequency system. By aligning the molecules we can probably get an increased flow, where we need it most, and by scrambling the molecular alignment, we could slow down the flow, therefore we could completely control the flow and speed at will. Perhaps we might slow down the fluid to work on a forward piece of pipeline, and then allow it to return to speed once that section is completed, and the fluid can then pass through.

Being able to control the fluid inside of a pipeline has great advantages regardless of the type of fluid. Now then, we are all aware of the challenges with water mains, long water pipes, as well as crude oil. Just this year we had a major crude oil pipeline break in the trans-Canadian pipeline, and we had in 2010 a major natural gas line which broke in California, and another in 2011 in Pennsylvania. Imagine if those didn't need to happen, and we had more control of the fluid inside, whether it be gas or liquid.

Perhaps we should be doing research and development on this type of technology to coincide with the future materials which will allow us to do it. Remember carbon nanotubes are a great conductor of electricity, and the interior of such pipes might be coated with some type of ceramic, and we will be able to control the frequency, temperature, and all sorts of things inside the pipe thanks to future new materials. Please consider all this and think on it.

Lance Winslow is the Founder of the Online Think Tank, a diverse group of achievers, experts, innovators, entrepreneurs, thinkers, futurists, academics, dreamers, leaders, and general all around brilliant minds. Lance Winslow hopes you've enjoyed today's discussion and topic. http://www.worldthinktank.net/ - Have an important subject to discuss, contact Lance Winslow.

View Article_Source

We Need a Molecular Bomb Diffuser Frequency Beam

The other day I was discussing with an acquaintance the challenges of defeating a suicide terrorist bomber who had a hand trigger device, and when he released the trigger it automatically went off. Therefore if anything happened to him his hand would release automatically setting off the detonation. There are other tricky triggers like that one with a mercury switch where if a person falls on the ground, the bomb would also go off.

With the common and easier to make device; the hand trigger with a spring on it, the individual could be shot in the head for instance, and there would be no brain signals to the muscles in the hand to release, therefore it can't detonate when the terrorist is eliminated in this way. However with the mercury switch, the individual still would fall to the floor after being shot and the bomb would go off anyway. Therefore in our discussion we were trying to figure out what technologies we need to design in the future to combat this.

I told my acquaintance, Troy Laclaire, that I'd have to consider this. And I said wouldn't it be nice if we had a tractor-beam which picked up the suspect and suspended him in the air, hitting him with a frequency device like a virtual stun gun. Then wheel in a bomb trashcan or bomb containment device underneath him, and then simply turning it off. The suspect would fall into the trashcan or bomb containment device and blow up. And you just wheel out the trash.

Those technologies will not be available for a while, but it would make a nice science fiction film. However, perhaps there is another way to do this. We need a molecular bomb diffuser frequency beam, one which could scramble the ionic-chemical-bonding between the molecules which make up the explosive chemicals. Therefore separating them and preventing them from recombining while the beam was focused on the suicide bomber.

At the same time you would hit the individual's brain or head with a stun gun beam, preventing him from acting or setting off and detonating the device. Next, you would collect the suspect while keeping the beam on him, and then throwing him in the bomb containment device. Then he could explode the device any time he wanted to, and that wouldn't hurt anyone.

Of course you wouldn't have the suspect to interrogate because by then he'd be in 1 million pieces. But you would've saved lives. Indeed I hope you will please consider all this and think on it. If you have any other interesting ideas or concepts to make something like this work please shoot me an e-mail. Maybe this is a good future technology challenge for our security defenses.

Lance Winslow is a retired Founder of a Nationwide Franchise Chain, and now runs the Online Think Tank. Lance Winslow believes writing 24,000 articles by July 24, 2011 is going to be difficult because all the letters on his keyboard are now worn off now..

View Article_Source