The Most Important Rule in Choosing an Anger Management Specialist

How do you pick an anger management specialist/anger resolution therapist? They could present you with credentials and letters from universities, certificates, a copy of my resume, or something like that. However, even if they have all that, what makes you listen to them, heed their words and follow their training program? Well, why does anyone really ever listen to another person?

I believe the most important rule is found in the old saying, "No one cares how much you know unless/until they know how much you care." I've spent over three decades living that philosophy. It inspires me to study helping professions and guides me as an educator and social worker. Moreover, it helps me connect with people in serious pain who desperately need a friend who understands not only how they feel but also how they can get past what hurts. Drug addicts, abused children, confused, lonely, and angry people. I've been able to connect with tons of them.

The funny thing is, as much as the people I've helped could have sworn I walked in their shoes, most of the time, I just really cared enough to pay attention to them and help in any way that I knew how. I've never been a drug addict; never had cancer; never been divorced; never been a veteran yet, many of my clients who have lived these lives could have sworn I was because we connected. How is that possible? Was it trained "empathic response," or "reflective listening"? Truthfully, the answer would be "not really." It was just being there and realizing, "Holy smokes, that could 'a' been me. If I had those choices, in those circumstances, that could easily have been me. What would I want someone to do for me?" Sometimes, I just sit in awe of the person I'm listening to and think, "What a beautiful and strong person to still be alive and to be trusted by."

One thing I do know from all these incredible people who have taught me about life is this: if I have learned something, I should be ready to share it. Anger is something that I struggled with for years, even after achieving degrees and some professional success. Finally, I started to get a grip on it. Consequently, a voice in my heart said that other people need someone who "gets it" to be on their side helping them cross over.

I believe this is an essential value to providing successful help in any medical or educational profession. Some disagree because they feel such perspective damages objectivity. All I can say to that is that if a surgeon does not care about his or her patients to maintain objectivity, then what prevents that surgeon from treating anyone merely as a cadaver in a class? Clients, patients, and students deserve better than that because at any moment anyone of us can and might become a client, patient, or student to another helper. Even if the condition might be minor or common, if it is major to us, life altering to us, then that experience warrants a personable and compassionate response to those seeking help.

Yes, there are those people who habitually seek attention through various services and providers of those services. Even they deserve some compassion. After all, that's what often motivates their attention seeking behavior. Any one who has helped rehabilitate orthopedic patients knows that a person who develops a way of walking to compensate for a bad appendage must retrain their behavior even after the structure problem has been corrected. Therefore, it makes sense that although the conditions that prompted the behavior might be gone; the person still needs to learn a new way to behave that is more functional, useful, and productive.

That's why I work to help people resolve their anger, not just their anger issues. People who are angry may have a really good reason for it. When professionals tell them they don't have a reason for their feelings, they violate the client's sanctity as a person. Additionally, to leave people isolated and powerless to change in a cage of rage is flat-out cruel.

If someone offers you anger management, he or she might be helping you learn some tricks to help you act better. But if you want something more, you want you want anger resolution which aims to help you fix what you feel angry about and live not as a person struggling with anger but to become a person who is no longer in need of that anger. A good Anger Resolution Therapist (A.R.T.) doesn't fix your problems for you or make the world float into a fuzzy fog of pharmaceutical bliss. A good ART teaches and trains you through methods that help you recreate your influence in your environment. Moreover, after you start getting what you really want in the world, there's less that makes you angry; and, with less to be angry about, you experience a relaxed state of living and being that allows you to direct new energy toward the goals that inspire you and others, too.

As an anger resolution therapist and life coach, I believe that people may not consciously know how to or where to make the right changes in behavior that hurts us and hurts others. Therefore, helpers are essential as role models, guides, coaches, teammates, confidants, and as those who encourage.

A helper who has overcome his or her own adversity yet maintains compassion for those still struggling is far more valuable than one who merely masters sterile methods or tricks. Scientific methods and skills are essential to helping people gain ground in overcoming self-limiting behaviors, both physical and cognitive; but being a truly compassionate helper who can objectively observe and discern, blending the arts and sciences of helping is most effective and should be the goal of every helper. This is what all helpers should aspire to bring to their clients, students, or patients. Moreover, we should always be hungry to help more.

View Article_Source

Senate Democrats vent anger with Barack Obama - Politico

Senate Democrats — including typically mild-mannered Bill Nelson of Florida — lit into President Barack Obama during an unusually tense air-clearing caucus session on Thursday, senators and staffers told POLITICO.

Nelson told colleagues Obama’s unpopularity has become a serious liability for Democrats in his state and blamed the president for creating a toxic political environment for Democrats nationwide, according to two Democrats familiar with his remarks.

Continue Reading “It was a raucous caucus,” said one Democratic senator, who spoke on condition of anonymity because closed-door sessions are not supposed to be discussed with outsiders.

Nelson declined to respond when asked about the incident Thursday night, saying he was in a hurry to leave the Capitol to catch a flight. His spokesman didn’t return a request for comment.

In interviews after the marathon three-hour meeting, several senators and senior aides told POLITICO that Nelson was just one of several senators to express anger at White House missteps — and air deep concerns about their own political fates if Obama and the Democratic Party leadership can’t turn things around by 2012.

Added one veteran senator: “It was the most frank exchange of views I’ve ever seen.”

Several senators expressed the opinion that Obama needed to show more passion, while party liberals renewed their complaint that Obama should abandon the pretense of bipartisanship in the face of Minority Leader Mitch McConnell’s intransigence and what they consider the Kentucky Republican’s blatantly political tactics aimed at making Obama a one-term president.

Others said Democratic leaders need to clearly spell out what they believe are the motivations behind the Republicans' positions: that they are beholden to special interests, who bankroll their campaigns.

If Democrats keep losing the message war, they worry, they will be wiped out in 2012.

“There was a lot of passion in that room,” one senator said. “The reason is because the public is with us on our policies, but they’re not getting the message.”

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and other Democratic leaders had met with Obama at the White House earlier in the day, calmly presided over the gripe session, sources say, allowing members to have their say.

Reid, who barely survived a challenge from tea party favorite Sharron Angle, has already taken steps to improve his own messaging operation, tapping New York Sen. Chuck Schumer to run the communications and policy operations of the Democratic Caucus in the next Congress.

With 21 Democrats and two independents facing reelection in 2012, Reid and the White House will be forced to deal with skittish Democrats eager to see a sharpened political operation.

But the complaints are not new. Over the past year, Senate Democrats have expressed dissatisfaction with Obama’s policy priorities, especially his determination to ram through a health care bill against the objections of party conservatives like Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.). The caucus’s left wing, including Vermont independent Bernie Sanders, have argued the opposite point: that Obama’s timidity has led to the defection of liberals and young people turned off by Obama compromises on the public option and economic stimulus.

Thursday’s confrontation reminded some of a February 2010 showdown between Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.) and Obama’s senior adviser David Axelrod after the president’s question-and-answer session with senators. An irate Franken, witnesses told POLITICO at the time, dressed down Axelrod and the White House for failing to provide a clearer sense of direction on health reform and other large legislative initiatives.

View the original article here